- Google News [Summary of the news published]
Maintenance Romina adult children, but that 'lost check.
Supreme Court ruling on the separation of Albano-Power
First round 1-1 between Bernardini Peace (Romina) and Galicia Danovi (Albano)
The Supreme Court accepted the request of Romina Power of a reasonable monthly allowance by Al Bano in favor of two daughters living with her in Rome.
The judges also wanted to reiterate a concept that regards the new law on custody shared: fees for their children should not be split in half but will continue to be based on parental income. [The law in effect says that the division of costs is made in proportion to the income of each]
Al Bano is burdened with an amount to be determined (Romina asked ten thousand euro per month for each daughter). Al Bano says "surprise" of the sentence and calls itself "mocked" and screams at the "scandal",
"The only positive aspect is that the ruling of the Supreme Court fails to check the Romina Power": This is the hot comment Al Bano Carrisi.
In these years - he added - I paid for everything myself. Cristel and Romina jr studied in the best schools: the first, the smaller of the two, in Rome at Marymount and the other, satisfying his desire, Switzerland. But I am glad I do not feel a victim to this. If now I have to pay more money, I would not have forced me to go and steal. " After separation and before divorce, "When I started my report Loredana Lecciso with, she started to give me the war. I do not know what triggered in the mind of a woman, for these years, I have always paid € 3,600 per month. "
The former wife of singer Puglia Cellino San Marco will not, however, entitled to any alimony for herself, in the opinion of the Supreme Court, Romina has not suffered from marital breakdown, a "drop in income that justify "a financial contribution from Albano.
With this decision, the Supreme Court took the opportunity to make some important statements also on the recent law (No. 54 of 2006) shared custody. In particular, the Supreme Court upheld the first of the three grounds of appeal presented by Romina against the decision which the Court of Appeal of Lecce April 27, 2002, stated that the joint custody of Cristel and Romina Albano Jolanda meant that their mother was not to give any allowance for the two girls as on each of the two parents - given the choice of foster care, "both parents" - "had an equal burden" the obligation of maintenance. This interpretation on the joint economic costs of foster care - in the sense that both parents would be understood as a division to 50% of the costs for the children - was not shared by the Supreme Court which, without half-words, he considered "wrong." In this respect the "ermine" say that "even the law 54 of 2006, recently approved, is a further and final confirmation that joint custody can certainly not be lacking to the capital requirements of a parent to help with the payment of a check, the maintenance children, in relation to their needs and, based on family and social context to which they belong. " For the Supreme Court has joint custody as "automatic consequence" the "principle that each parent shall directly and independently to the needs of children." In practice the parent more 'strong' economy, will continue to make allowance for dependent children in the hands of the parent with whom the children live.
[NDR the law says that for children of the allowance is paid directly to children, who can decide for themselves in their lives. it is assumed that if a majority would vote for him to direct the check. if the judges believe that an adult is not entitled to maintenance in direct form, would do better to ban the minor in order to prevent that person unable to alter election results.]
"For my children I never spared nothing, Cristel and Romina have always paid the costs of education, and attended good schools. As for my ex-wife, I'm tired and embittered, and for years to check, and although 'she was the promoter of our division. "Cosi 'Albano Carrisi, reached by telephone to act, says the sentence.
The Supreme Court's decision, as explained the defender of the singer's lawyer Anne Galicia Danovi , refers to the terms of separation while in the process of divorce, the judge of the Court of Brindisi has determined that Albania should pay a sum to the former wife. "I'm happy for the principle expressed by the Supreme Court staff on the check to Mrs. Power, which must 'take into account the divorce court, on the contrary - said the lawyer - had given him provisionally. Against this decision, we continue to submit requests for amendments which have not yet been examined. " The maintenance
her two children, added the lawyer, no objection, "Albano has never questioned, has always paid what was needed, perhaps even more 'than what he had to."
The singer, however, calls it "a bitter story," the years spent in court to establish the criteria for custody of his daughters and their maintenance. "Before the separation - Albano said - we had decided what it was and we both agree on everything. Then, when Romina requested sole custody of the girls, who had gone with her to Rome, I realized that things were changed, and the start of the requests for money ... love can 'last a day, a year or a lifetime, it would more 'respect for what' and that 'lived. And then, from the standpoint of Romina, but I do not see why 'must always be the man to pay: and' she who got 'round, breaking a pair of great artistic achievement. "
A Seven years after separation, marital and professional Albano Carrisi and Romina Power is 'face' is still in court. A ruling of the Supreme Court (n.18187) filed today allowed an appeal of games on the revaluation of the contribution due from Albania for two more daughters' small born from their marriage. Romina, in fact, had been refused such a request (with the demand of 10 million lire a month for each child) by the Court of Appeal Lecce, along with that in which he asked that it be given a check for their sustenance.
one of those occasions, moreover, observe the 'ermine', "though he failed the assignment in question to be the daughters become adults in the meantime, this does not change for the national court to the terms of the question, the persisting 'obligation to maintain, regardless of the coming of age', until 'the daughters do not become self-sufficient economically. "
Romina Power, but 'not receive' any allowance by her former husband, for their sustenance: for the judges of Piazza Cavour, his appeal on this point and ' "unacceptable" and "logical and adequate" were the arguments of the Court responsible "not considering the decrease in the income of the same to an extent to justify the payment of that check and assess its ability in practice 'professional and frequent participation in events , exhibitions and other events. "
The Court of Appeal of Lecce instead asserted that the joint custody of Cristel and Romina Albano Jolanda meant that their mother should not give any allowance for the two girls as on each of the two parents was''an equal burden ''the obligation of maintenance. For the parent stoats more 'strong' cost, must 'continue to pay allowance for dependent children in the hands of the parent with whom the children live.
marriage, even artistic, the couple - celebrated on July 26, 1970 in a huge crowd - it lasted for almost thirty years, until the separation by mutual agreement signed by the Court of Brindisi May 27, 1999.
not exactly "happiness" the Al Bano the news of the ruling of the Supreme Court. Romina Power, his wife of 29 years, he was right and their daughters (age) Cristel and Romina junior will receive the Melodious Cellino a "reasonable allowance". Mr. Carroll: "It 'a scandal, she was to leave. The only positive aspect of the sentence is that we should not give the check to Romina, 3600 € per month. "The Supreme Court pointed out that the singer" the children are kept until they reach economic independence. "Even Al Bano:" If I have to pay more money , I would not have forced me to go and steal. In recent years I have paid for everything myself. The children I have grown myself. I found myself to father and mother, while Romina had existential crises. "
(Source: La Repubblica," QN-Day "," The Messenger ")
In particular, the Supreme Court - with the sentence 18,187 filed and made public only today, despite the closed session took place last February 27 - accepted the first of three reasons appeal submitted by Romina, defense lawyer Annamaria Bernardini De Pace, against the decision which the Court of Appeal of Lecce April 27, 2002, stated that the joint custody of Cristel and Romina Jolanda meant that Albano did not have to give their mother no allowance for the two girls as on each of two parents - given the choice of foster care 'both parents' - was to''impose''an equal obligation of maintenance.
This interpretation on the joint economic costs of foster care - in the sense that both parents' would be understood as a division to 50% of the costs for the children - was not shared by the Supreme Court which, without half-words, has judged the''wrong''.
In particular, the Supreme - 18,187 deposited with the sentence and made public only today, despite the closed session took place last February 27 - has accepted the first of the three grounds of appeal submitted by Romina , defended by ' lawyer Annamaria Bernardini De Pace, against the decision which the Court of Appeal of Lecce April 27, 2002, stated that the joint custody of Cristel and Romina Albano Jolanda meant that their mother was not to give any allowance for the two girls as on each of two parents - given the choice of foster care 'both parents' - was to impose an equal'''' the obligation of maintenance.
This interpretation on the economic costs of foster care joint - meaning that both parents' would be understood as a division to 50% of the costs for the children - was not shared by the Supreme Court which, without half-words, has judged the''wrong'' .
joint custody order to the Supreme Court did not automatically result''as''the principle''that each parent provides a direct and independent the needs of children.'' In practice the parent more 'strong economy, will continue to make allowance for dependent children in the hands of the parent with whom the boys live.
Piazza Cavour also states that if the children are age - as in the case of the Cristel and Romina Jolanda, who are age 18 years during the proceedings - is clearly not the assignment, but'' continues the obligation of maintaining , regardless of the age of majority, until 'the children do not become self-sufficient economically.''
Now the Court of Appeal of Lecce must comply with these principles and to charge a Albano allowance for the two daughters ( the amount to be determined), by Romina match that he had asked ten thousand euro of maintenance for each of the two girls. A
Romina - as had happened to his request to get a check for himself the of € 5,164 per month - remains only the possibility of using two flats in the estate of Albano, campaigns in Cellino San Marco.
from the wedding couple's two other children were born: the eldest Yari, and the second- Ylenia, disappeared during a trip to the U.S. in mysterious circumstances. Albano then had two other children from the next Together with Loredana Lecciso.
THE REACTION OF AL BANO
" For my children I never spared nothing , Cristel and Romina have always paid the costs of education, and attended good schools. As far as my ex-wife, I'm tired and embittered, and for years to check, even though she was the initiator of our division. "
"Before the separation - says Al Bano - we decided what it was for both the and we agreed on everything. Then, when Romina requested sole custody of the girls, that she had gone to Rome, I realized that things had changed, and the start of the requests for money ... A love can last a day, a year or a lifetime, it would more respect for what has been experienced. And then, from the standpoint of Romina, but I do not see why it must always be the man to pay for: is that she is gone, breaking a pair of great artistic achievement. " Bernardini
The War [to share] won his first battle?
The issue, in legal terms, is scaled Danovi from Galicia, a lawyer representing Al Bano according to which things to change not only in the last two years, addressed the divorce between the former spouses, but also changed the lives of two daughters.
"The largest, Cristel, for years no longer lives with her mother and is completely independent on the economic front, as well Romina Jolanda has sources of income and are often in Cellino San Marco from the father." Cristel worked as a singer, while Romina Jr attended with her father, as a competitor, the latest edition of the Island of the Famous, an opportunity to cast her in the world of television and housed.
